Layer 1s
Comprehensive AI-powered analysis of Layer 1 blockchain networks
179 reports
Bitcoin
8.6/10The original decentralized cryptocurrency — unmatched in security and decentralization.
Ethereum
8.4/10Battle-tested L1 with the strongest ecosystem but high fees on mainnet.
Cardano
7.0/10Research-first L1 with strong decentralization but slow ecosystem growth.
Avalanche
6.8/10Subnet-powered L1 with fast finality and institutional appeal but ecosystem contraction.
Polkadot
6.6/10Technically brilliant multi-chain protocol struggling with real-world ecosystem traction.
Solana
6.6/10High-performance L1 with explosive growth but reliability and decentralization trade-offs.
Cosmos
6.4/10App-chain pioneer with IBC interoperability but ATOM struggles for value accrual.
Injective
6.4/10Finance-first Cosmos L1 with native orderbook and deflationary tokenomics — one of the stronger newer L1s.
Near Protocol
6.4/10User-friendly sharded L1 pivoting to chain abstraction but still building ecosystem momentum.
Algorand
6.2/10Turing Award-backed L1 with elegant consensus but fading ecosystem and market relevance.
AO (Arweave)
6.0/10Hyper-parallel decentralized computer on Arweave — technically ambitious with genuine innovation in parallel execution, but early-stage and architecturally complex.
Stacks
6.0/10Smart contracts on Bitcoin via Proof of Transfer — interesting thesis, but ecosystem is tiny vs Ethereum.
BNB Chain
5.8/10Binance's high-activity EVM chain — massive ecosystem but effectively centralized by the exchange.
Humanode
5.8/10Humanode is a genuinely innovative L1 using facial biometrics for Sybil resistance — technically interesting but faces massive adoption and privacy hurdles.
Kaspa
5.8/10PoW BlockDAG aiming to be the fastest proof-of-work chain — hot narrative, very early ecosystem.
Sui
5.8/10Move-based high-performance L1 with strong tech but centralization and token distribution concerns.
TON
5.8/10Telegram-integrated L1 with massive distribution potential but centralization and regulatory concerns.
Aleph Zero
5.6/10Privacy-focused L1 with peer-reviewed AlephBFT consensus and ZK-SNARK-powered confidential transactions.
SEI
5.6/10Parallelized EVM L1 targeting trading — strong tech thesis but needs ecosystem to match ambitions.
Core DAO
5.5/10Bitcoin-aligned L1 enabling non-custodial BTC staking through Satoshi Plus consensus.
Alephium
5.4/10Sharded PoW blockchain extending Bitcoin's UTXO model with stateful smart contracts via BlockFlow.
Berachain
5.4/10EVM L1 with novel Proof of Liquidity consensus — validators must provide DeFi liquidity as part of block production, a genuinely innovative design with cult-like community but unproven at scale.
Energy Web
5.4/10Energy Web targets a real-world niche in decentralized energy infrastructure with strong enterprise partnerships, but its narrow vertical focus and modest tokenomics limit broad crypto investor appeal.
Hedera
5.4/10Enterprise-governed hashgraph network — fast and cheap, but centralized by design.
Mina Protocol
5.4/10The 22KB blockchain — groundbreaking zk cryptography, but ecosystem and throughput need to catch up.
Radix
5.4/10DeFi-native L1 with asset-oriented Scrypto language designed to eliminate smart contract exploits.
Sonic Labs (Fantom)
5.4/10Fantom reborn as Sonic — technical overhaul with new VM and consensus for better performance, Andre Cronje involvement, but rebrand complexity and L1 competition create uncertainty.
Telos
5.4/10Telos combines EOSIO's high-performance architecture with an EVM layer and ESG positioning, offering unique anti-front-running features but struggling with ecosystem growth against larger competitors.
Flare Network
5.3/10Data oracle L1 bringing BTC and XRP into DeFi through native protocol-level oracle infrastructure.
Kaia
5.3/10Kakao + LINE blockchain merger targeting 250M+ messaging users with Web3 mini-apps.
Nervos Network
5.3/10UTXO-based L1 pivoting to Bitcoin L2 through RGB++ protocol, extending BTC with smart contracts.
Persistence
5.3/10Cosmos-based L1 building a liquid staking hub through pSTAKE Finance — solid Cosmos SDK foundation but facing fierce liquid staking competition from Lido, Stride, and others across multiple chains.
Saga
5.3/10Cosmos-based app-chain-as-a-service protocol — interesting modular thesis but early ecosystem, unproven demand for dedicated chainlets.
Verus Coin
5.3/10Fair-launch L1 with VerusID decentralized identity and hybrid PoW/PoS — strong community ethos and genuine innovation, but small ecosystem and low visibility.
Massa
5.2/10Massa introduces autonomous smart contracts that self-execute on schedule — genuinely novel tech from a French academic team, but ecosystem growth has been slow.
Moonbeam
5.2/10Polkadot's EVM parachain enabling cross-chain connected contracts through native XCM integration.
MultiversX
5.2/10Technically solid sharded L1 with European roots, but ecosystem remains small post-Elrond rebrand.
Quantum Resistant Ledger
5.2/10The real deal for quantum resistance — XMSS hash-based signatures are provably secure, but the chain has near-zero adoption and a tiny ecosystem.
Tezos
5.2/10Self-amending blockchain with strong governance but a shrinking ecosystem that hasn't kept pace with competitors.
Astar Network
5.1/10Polkadot's leading smart contract hub with multi-VM support and developer-incentivized dApp staking.
Conflux Network
5.1/10China's only compliant public blockchain with tree-graph consensus and BSN integration.
Shardeum
5.1/10EVM-compatible sharded L1 promising linear scalability — ambitious tech but pre-mainnet, unproven at production scale.
ThunderCore
5.1/10ThunderCore uses the academically-backed PaLa consensus for fast EVM-compatible transactions, but struggles with ecosystem growth and decentralization despite solid technical foundations.
Aptos
5.0/10VC-backed Move L1 with solid tech but weak ecosystem adoption and heavy centralization.
Internet Computer
5.0/10Revolutionary tech ambitions marred by one of crypto's worst token launches and persistent insider trust issues.
IoTeX
5.0/10IoT-focused L1 powering decentralized machine economy through W3bstream verifiable compute.
Rootstock (RSK)
5.0/10Bitcoin's oldest smart contract sidechain — technically sound with merge-mining security, but ecosystem growth has been slow.
Vara Network
5.0/10Substrate-based L1 using the Actor model for smart contracts — technically distinctive but niche developer appeal and small ecosystem.
Archway
4.9/10Cosmos L1 that shares revenue with dApp developers — compelling incentive model but faces stiff competition from other Cosmos chains and limited ecosystem traction.
Fuse Network
4.9/10Fuse Network targets mobile-first crypto payments with a DPoS EVM-compatible L1, offering low fees but facing limited adoption and ecosystem depth compared to larger chains.
Hive Blockchain
4.9/10Decentralized social blockchain forked from Steem. Feeless transactions and content rewards sustain a loyal niche community, but growth has stalled.
LUKSO
4.9/10Creative economy L1 with Universal Profile smart accounts reimagining digital identity and ownership.
Shimmer
4.9/10IOTA's staging network with feeless DAG architecture — technically interesting but heavily dependent on IOTA's success and struggling with independent ecosystem development.
Viction (Formerly TomoChain)
4.9/10Viction (ex-TomoChain) differentiates with zero-gas-fee transactions for an accessible Web3 UX, but the ecosystem remains small and the rebrand has yet to drive meaningful adoption increases.
Agoric
4.8/10Hardened JavaScript L1 on Cosmos from smart contract theory pioneers — technically excellent but ecosystem adoption lags Solidity-dominated chains.
Chia Network
4.8/10Proof of Space and Time blockchain by BitTorrent's creator — novel green consensus and strong technical pedigree but struggling with adoption and enterprise traction.
Fantom
4.8/10DeFi-era darling rebranding as Sonic after ecosystem decline — high-risk reinvention play.
Findora
4.8/10Findora combines zero-knowledge proofs with a dual-chain (UTXO + EVM) architecture for privacy-preserving DeFi, but low adoption and ecosystem immaturity are major concerns.
Hathor Network
4.8/10DAG+chain hybrid merge-mined with Bitcoin — solid technical design but tiny ecosystem mainly in Brazil.
Komodo
4.8/10OG atomic swap pioneer with Bitcoin-backed security — technically underrated but perpetually overlooked in market attention.
Tron
4.8/10Stablecoin transfer king with massive USDT volume but deeply centralized and controversial.
Canton Network
4.7/10Enterprise permissioned blockchain for institutional DeFi with strong tech but limited decentralization.
Casper Network
4.7/10Enterprise L1 with CBC Casper consensus and upgradeable contracts for institutional blockchain adoption.
Chromia
4.7/10Relational blockchain using SQL-like Rell language for data-rich dApps like games and social platforms.
NuLink
4.7/10NuLink combines multiple privacy technologies for encrypted data sharing — technically ambitious but pre-mature with limited real adoption and a crowded privacy infrastructure market.
NULS
4.7/10NULS offers a genuinely innovative modular blockchain architecture with ChainBox for custom chain creation, but has failed to attract meaningful developer adoption or ecosystem growth despite years of development.
Oasys
4.7/10Japan's gaming blockchain with Sega and Bandai Namco as validators and game-specific L2 Verse Layers.
Ontology
4.7/10Identity-focused L1 with W3C DID compliance and enterprise partnerships — technically mature but ecosystem growth has stalled.
Oraichain
4.7/10Cosmos-based L1 bridging AI and blockchain through decentralized AI oracles — ambitious vision combining two hot narratives, but execution and adoption remain early-stage with limited real-world AI oracle demand proven.
WAX
4.7/10EOSIO-based NFT and gaming blockchain with gasless transactions and billions of NFT transfers processed.
Comdex
4.6/10Cosmos DeFi infrastructure chain with Harbor stablecoin and Commodo lending — technically competent Cosmos SDK build but struggling with extremely low adoption, thin TVL, and a stablecoin (CMST) that never achieved meaningful scale.
Constellation
4.6/10DAG-based Hypergraph network with US government ties — ambitious enterprise data validation play, small ecosystem.
Elastos
4.6/10Decentralized internet OS secured by Bitcoin merge-mining — technically expansive but struggling to translate grand vision into adoption.
Flow
4.6/10Dapper Labs' NFT-focused chain that peaked with NBA Top Shot — struggling for relevance post-NFT boom.
ICON
4.6/10Korea's interoperability L1 with government ties and BTP cross-chain protocol — respected locally but global ecosystem remains small.
Kadena
4.6/10Multi-chain PoW with a unique smart contract language — technically interesting but ecosystem is nearly empty.
Kava
4.6/10Cosmos-based DeFi chain that had early traction but lost momentum as the DeFi landscape evolved.
Signum
4.6/10The original green blockchain with PoC+ mining — technologically innovative but ecosystem is nearly abandoned.
Stratis
4.6/10Stratis uniquely targets the vast .NET developer community with C#-based blockchain tools and enterprise focus, but has failed to capture significant market share despite a differentiated technology approach.
ARK Ecosystem
4.5/10Point-Click-Blockchain deployer letting anyone launch custom chains — technically elegant DPoS platform with a loyal community but near-zero adoption of its chain-deployment thesis, overshadowed by Cosmos SDK and Substrate.
Counterparty
4.5/10OG Bitcoin smart contracts and birthplace of NFTs (Rare Pepes) — historically iconic, Bitcoin-secured, but limited throughput and overshadowed by Ordinals and modern L2s.
CUDOS
4.5/10CUDOS attempted to decentralize cloud computing on a Cosmos-based L1 before merging into the ASI Alliance, making its standalone chain assessment largely historical with token migration implications.
Neon EVM
4.5/10EVM execution on Solana — clever tech bridge, but unclear why Ethereum devs would choose Solana-via-Neon over native options.
Starcoin
4.5/10Starcoin was an early Move language L1 — technically solid but completely overshadowed by Aptos and Sui, with a near-dead ecosystem.
Supra
4.5/10Oracle-native L1 embedding price feeds and VRF into consensus for sub-second finality without external dependencies.
SX Network
4.5/10Prediction market L1 built as a Polygon supernet — niche but functional on-chain sports betting with limited decentralization and small user base.
Hydra Chain
4.4/10Hydra Chain attempts to create a self-sustaining blockchain economy through novel tokenomics combining staking inflation with fee burning, but extremely low adoption and tiny ecosystem severely limit its viability.
Karura
4.4/10Kusama's DeFi hub and Acala's canary network — technically sound with integrated DeFi primitives but declining alongside Kusama's ecosystem contraction and Acala's credibility challenges.
Proton XPR
4.4/10Compliance-focused feeless blockchain tied to Metal Pay — solid identity/payment concept but struggling ecosystem and uncertain future amid Metal Blockchain pivot.
VeChain
4.4/10Supply chain blockchain with real enterprise clients but centralized governance and a thin DeFi ecosystem.
Venom
4.4/10Abu Dhabi-backed TVM-based L1 with enterprise focus — regulatory positioning is unique but small ecosystem, centralized governance, and TVM niche limits appeal.
Vite
4.4/10DAG-based L1 with zero-fee transactions and async architecture — technically innovative with genuine fee-less design, but minimal adoption, thin liquidity, and a shrinking ecosystem make it a high-risk niche bet.
Zenon
4.4/10Mysterious dual-ledger L1 with feeless transactions and devoted community — technically novel but very early with minimal ecosystem.
Abelian
4.3/10Post-quantum privacy L1 using lattice-based cryptography — technically ambitious but extremely early with minimal ecosystem and unproven real-world demand.
Monad
4.3/10Parallel EVM L1 promising 10,000 TPS — technically ambitious with strong VC backing, but pre-mainnet with no token, no live ecosystem, and unproven claims. Invest in the vision, not the product.
ONUS Chain
4.3/10Vietnamese exchange-backed L1 targeting Southeast Asia — benefits from ONUS exchange's 8M+ user base but faces severe centralization concerns and limited appeal outside its home market.
Accumulate
4.2/10Identity-centric blockchain reborn from Factom — novel ADI architecture but minimal ecosystem traction and unclear path to mainstream adoption.
Cronos POS Chain
4.2/10Cosmos-based chain powering Crypto.com's staking — functional infrastructure, not an independent ecosystem.
Theta Metachain
4.2/10Theta's subchain infrastructure enables app-specific chains connected to the mainchain — technically capable but ecosystem growth has been slow beyond the video streaming niche.
Theta Network
4.2/10Decentralized video streaming blockchain — interesting niche but limited traction and narrow use case.
XDC Network (XinFin)
4.2/10Hybrid enterprise blockchain for trade finance with real partnerships but centralized operations and thin DeFi.
Zetrix
4.2/10Malaysian government-backed enterprise L1 -- real government partnerships but highly centralized with minimal DeFi ecosystem.
Meter
4.1/10DeFi L1 with a PoW-mined stablecoin and cross-chain bridge — clever economic design but ecosystem adoption remains elusive.
Tari
4.1/10Monero-linked privacy-focused blockchain for confidential digital assets — technically interesting but years in development with no ecosystem, unproven market fit.
Theta Fuel (TFUEL)
4.1/10Theta Network's gas/utility token — functional for on-chain operations and edge node rewards but hampered by inflation, weak demand, and Theta's unfulfilled adoption potential.
Topl
4.1/10Impact-focused blockchain for ESG and supply chain verification — noble mission but very early stage with limited adoption and unproven market demand.
Wanchain
4.1/10Cross-chain L1 with sMPC bridges to 30+ chains — technically capable bridge infrastructure but ecosystem adoption is minimal.
Callisto Network
4.0/10Ethereum Classic fork with cold staking and security auditing focus — technically honest but effectively abandoned with near-zero ecosystem.
DeFiChain
4.0/10Bitcoin DeFi sidechain — native DeFi primitives anchored to BTC, dedicated community, but limited ecosystem growth and inflexible architecture compared to EVM chains.
Fusion
4.0/10Innovative time-lock and cross-chain cryptography for DeFi primitives — technically creative but marred by low adoption and founder controversies.
Holo (HOT)
4.0/10Holochain's hosting token — radical P2P architecture but years of delays and no mainnet make it a high-risk bet.
NEM (XEM)
4.0/10Once a top-20 blockchain with novel PoI consensus — now declining as the Symbol successor failed to revive momentum.
Neurai
4.0/10Ravencoin fork adding AI data features — GPU-mineable with a tiny community and aspirational AI integration that remains largely theoretical.
Songbird
4.0/10Flare's canary network — real-value testbed for data protocols, useful but inherently secondary to the mainnet.
Swisstronik
4.0/10Swiss-regulated L1 using TEEs for compliant privacy — interesting compliance angle but tiny ecosystem and TEE trust assumptions undermine the decentralization narrative.
Ternoa
4.0/10Time capsule blockchain on Substrate — novel encrypted NFT concept for digital legacy, but minimal ecosystem traction and unproven market demand.
Zilliqa
4.0/10First sharded blockchain — historically significant but ecosystem is nearly gone; gaming pivot is a long shot.
MediBloc
3.8/10Healthcare blockchain for patient-controlled medical data — real partnerships in South Korea but facing massive adoption barriers from healthcare industry inertia.
Neo
3.8/10The 'Chinese Ethereum' that faded — once a top-10 project, now struggling with minimal ecosystem.
Vanar Chain
3.8/10Entertainment-focused L1 with gasless UX — early stage with big ambitions but minimal proven traction and heavy centralization.
MegaETH
3.7/10Real-time EVM blockchain targeting 100K+ TPS via optimized single sequencer — technically fascinating but radically centralized by design, pre-mainnet with unproven claims.
Sologenic
3.7/10Tokenized securities platform on XRP Ledger — interesting TradFi bridge concept but limited adoption, regulatory uncertainty, and stiff competition from better-funded RWA players.
WEMIX
3.7/10Korean gaming giant WEMADE's blockchain — real game portfolio and user base, but Korean exchange delistings over token transparency issues severely damaged credibility.
aelf
3.6/10Cloud computing blockchain with multi-sidechain architecture — technically decent but has pivot-hopped through narratives without finding lasting product-market fit.
IOST
3.6/10High-TPS chain from 2018 that never lived up to 100K TPS claims — now pivoting to AI narratives to stay relevant.
KardiaChain
3.6/10Vietnamese L1 with dual-node interoperability — interesting tech targeting Southeast Asian enterprise adoption but limited global relevance.
Nexus
3.6/10Quantum-resistant chain with satellite mesh networking ambitions — visionary but near-zero adoption after 8+ years.
Nyzo
3.6/10Zero-fee blockchain built from scratch with proof-of-diversity consensus — technically original and fair-launched, but struggling to build any meaningful ecosystem.
Phantasma
3.6/10NFT-focused smart chain with on-chain storage — interesting tech buried under near-zero adoption.
Q Blockchain
3.6/10Constitutional governance blockchain with enforceable rules and dispute resolution — novel governance model but niche appeal and limited adoption beyond governance enthusiasts.
Qubic
3.6/10AI-focused blockchain with quorum-based execution — innovative concept but extremely early and unproven.
Saito
3.6/10Novel L1 using Proof of Routing to incentivize network infrastructure — academically interesting consensus innovation with near-zero ecosystem.
Divi
3.5/10Masternode PoS chain with one-click node setup and mobile-first design. Niche community, limited adoption and ecosystem.
CyberVein
3.4/10DAG blockchain for big data using Proof of Contribution — technically interesting concept but struggling with adoption and ecosystem development.
Libre
3.4/10EOSIO-based Bitcoin sidechain targeting institutional DeFi — ambitious thesis but extremely early with minimal adoption.
Obyte
3.4/10DAG-based ledger with unique conditional payments — technically novel but ecosystem is effectively dead.
Velas
3.4/10Solana fork with EVM compatibility and AI marketing — technically functional but with negligible ecosystem and unclear direction.
Waves
3.4/10Russian L1 damaged by the NSBT/USDN stablecoin depeg — trust eroded and ecosystem shrinking.
Aeternity (AE)
3.3/10State channel pioneer with integrated oracles — technically impressive but zero adoption. An Erlang-built ghost chain slowly dying from irrelevance despite legitimate engineering.
Bitrock
3.3/10Low-fee EVM chain with 10-second blocks — functional but undifferentiated, competing against dozens of similar L1s with minimal unique value proposition.
EOS
3.2/10The $4B ICO that became crypto's cautionary tale — abandoned by its creator, ecosystem in freefall.
QANplatform
3.2/10Quantum-resistant L1 using lattice cryptography — addresses a real future threat but the quantum timeline makes current adoption challenging.
Carbon Browser
3.1/10Web3 browser with token rewards for browsing. Competes with Brave but with far less market share and a less proven token model.
XION
3.1/10Cosmos-based L1 tackling chain abstraction at the protocol level — ambitious tech thesis but ultra-low adoption and unproven in production at scale.
HyperCash
3.0/10Quantum-resistant hybrid chain that raised $51M in 2017 and delivered almost nothing — effectively dead.
QuarkChain
3.0/10Sharded L1 that was technically ahead of its time — now mostly dormant with negligible ecosystem activity.
Riecoin
3.0/10PoW mining that finds prime number constellations for mathematical research — a noble experiment with near-zero real-world adoption.
SERO
3.0/10Privacy L1 with ZK-SNARK smart contracts — technically capable but ecosystem is nearly empty.
Cellframe
2.9/10Post-quantum L1 with service-oriented architecture — technically ambitious but minimal ecosystem, low adoption, and competing against better-funded quantum-resistant chains.
GXChain
2.9/10China-based data exchange blockchain that once had enterprise partnerships — severely impacted by China's crypto crackdowns, with development stalled and the ecosystem effectively dormant. High risk of permanent decline.
BitShares
2.8/10DPoS pioneer and first DEX by Dan Larimer — historically significant but now a near-dead project with minimal development, negligible volume, and no competitive relevance.
CLV Chain
2.8/10Polkadot parachain with EVM compatibility and cross-chain ambitions — technically sound but lost in a sea of competing parachains with declining activity.
Ethereum Classic
2.8/10The original Ethereum chain post-DAO fork — historically significant, practically irrelevant.
GateChain
2.8/10Gate.io's L1 blockchain with novel vault/recovery features — interesting safety innovations but heavily centralized around the exchange with limited independent ecosystem growth.
Harmony
2.8/10Devastated by a $100M bridge hack and botched recovery — a cautionary tale of security failure and broken trust.
Metadium
2.8/10Korean identity-focused L1 with DID infrastructure — technically reasonable but outcompeted by larger identity solutions and struggling with adoption.
Ozone Chain
2.8/10Self-described quantum-resistant L1 — bold claims with almost no verifiable adoption, ecosystem, or technical validation.
Quai Network
2.8/10Multi-threaded L1 using merged mining across a hierarchy of chains — technically ambitious with real innovation but early-stage, unproven, and ecosystem-less.
SmartBCH
2.8/10Bitcoin Cash's EVM sidechain — technically competent but devastated by CoinFlex bridge insolvency that trapped user funds and destroyed trust.
Areon Network
2.7/10L1 claiming novel 'Proof of Area' consensus — marketing outpaces verifiable technology by a wide margin.
Bitci Chain
2.6/10Sports/esports-focused L1 from Turkey with fan token partnerships — thin tech, limited adoption.
Bitgert
2.6/10Ultra-low-gas EVM chain with exaggerated marketing claims — functional but undifferentiated with a low-quality ecosystem.
HAQQ Network
2.6/10EVM-compatible L1 targeting Islamic finance — interesting niche thesis but negligible DeFi activity and unclear how Shariah compliance translates to protocol-level differentiation.
Pirl
2.6/10Community-run Ethereum fork with masternodes — technically obsolete and nearly dead, kept alive by a handful of loyalists.
Reef Chain
2.6/10Substrate-based DeFi L1 — ambitious initial vision but severely criticized for broken promises, questionable token management, and an effectively dead ecosystem.
KuCoin Community Chain (KCC)
2.5/10KuCoin's exchange-backed EVM chain — a BSC clone that never gained traction. Minimal ecosystem, negligible TVL, and no compelling reason to use it over any major EVM chain.
NXT
2.5/10Pioneering 2013 PoS blockchain that introduced many industry firsts — historically important but functionally dormant, living on as a legacy chain maintained by loyal community.
Pi Network
2.5/10Massively popular mobile mining app with major centralization and transparency concerns.
DeSo
2.4/10Purpose-built social media L1 with on-chain posts and profiles — technically novel but usage has collapsed and Farcaster/Lens have captured the decentralized social narrative.
ZENIQ
2.4/10Hardware hub-based blockchain sold via network marketing — unconventional distribution model with limited technical differentiation and MLM-adjacent concerns.
Aion (The OAN)
2.0/10Originally an ambitious cross-chain interoperability L1, Aion rebranded to The OAN before effectively dying — development stopped, team dissolved, network abandoned. A cautionary tale of 2017-era blockchain ambition meeting execution reality.
MintMe
2.0/10Social token creation platform where anyone can mint and sell their own token — working product but micro-cap ecosystem with minimal adoption and questionable token value dynamics.
Nebulas (NAS)
1.9/10The 'Google for blockchains' that never indexed anything. Ambitious search and ranking protocol from a NEO co-founder — now effectively dead with zero ecosystem and 99%+ value loss.
Step Network
1.6/10Fitness-focused L1 riding the move-to-earn trend — the dedicated chain thesis for step- counting apps is extremely thin, and activity has evaporated with the broader M2E collapse.
EthereumFair (ETHF)
1.5/10Dead Ethereum PoW fork with no ecosystem, no developers, and no reason to exist — the less successful sibling of the already-unsuccessful EthereumPoW.
Toronet
1.5/10Nigerian payment blockchain with a financial inclusion mission — noble goal but negligible traction against dominant competitors in African fintech and established crypto payment chains.
Lamden
1.4/10Python smart contract chain — once promising for developer accessibility, now effectively dead.
Credits
1.2/10Dead L1 that claimed million TPS — team gone, development stopped, avoid entirely.
Minebase
1.1/10Mobile crypto mining app with vague technical claims — classic phone-mining project capitalizing on the 'mine from your phone' trend with no real substance.