Lending & Borrowing
Comprehensive AI-powered analysis of lending and borrowing protocols
70 reports
Aave
9.0/10The dominant decentralized lending protocol with the deepest liquidity, strongest security record, and widest multichain footprint in DeFi.
Compound
7.4/10The OG DeFi lending protocol that pioneered algorithmic money markets, now pivoting to a single-asset model with Compound III.
MakerDAO / Sky
7.4/10Creator of DAI stablecoin and DeFi's oldest lending protocol, now navigating a controversial rebrand to Sky that has divided its community.
Fluid (Instadapp)
7.0/10Instadapp's unified DeFi layer merging lending and DEX — genuinely novel capital efficiency by making debt positions serve as AMM liquidity.
Morpho
6.8/10A next-gen modular lending protocol offering permissionless market creation and improved capital efficiency through peer-to-peer matching and Morpho Blue.
Spark Protocol
6.7/10MakerDAO's lending frontend handling billions in TVL — strong institutional backing and battle-tested Aave V3 codebase, but governance complexity and Maker dependency.
Spark
6.6/10MakerDAO's lending arm built on an Aave V3 fork, offering subsidized DAI/USDS borrowing rates backed by the Maker ecosystem's deep liquidity.
Ajna Protocol
6.4/10The most trustless lending protocol in DeFi — no governance, no oracles, no admin keys — elegant design with limited adoption.
Fraxlend
6.4/10Frax's isolated lending pairs with unique interest rate mechanics — tightly integrated with the Frax ecosystem but dependent on its success.
Kamino Finance
6.4/10Solana's fastest-growing lending platform, combining automated liquidity vaults with lending — young but rapidly scaling.
Silo Finance
6.4/10Isolated lending markets that prevent risk contagion between assets — excellent risk design, limited adoption.
Benqi
6.0/10Avalanche's dominant lending protocol combining a Compound-style money market with liquid staking for AVAX, serving as essential DeFi infrastructure for the AVAX ecosystem.
Venus
6.0/10BNB Chain's dominant lending protocol with a Compound-style money market, recovering from early governance missteps and stablecoin depegging issues.
Euler Finance
5.8/10A permissionless lending protocol reborn after a $200M exploit — V2 is a complete rewrite with modular vaults, but the security scar lingers.
Notional Finance
5.8/10Fixed-rate DeFi lending via fCash tokens — addresses a real gap in DeFi but adoption has been persistently limited.
Moonwell
5.6/10Multi-chain lending protocol that pivoted successfully to Base, becoming a top lending option on Coinbase's L2. Fork-based but well-executed.
Scallop Lend
5.4/10Sui's leading lending protocol with institutional ambitions — strong execution on a young chain with ecosystem dependency risk.
Alchemix
5.3/10Self-repaying loan pioneer — genuinely innovative DeFi primitive with alETH/alUSD, but adoption has plateaued and ALCX token has weak value accrual.
JustLend
5.2/10Tron's largest lending protocol with massive TVL — but the ecosystem's deep centralization undermines DeFi credibility.
Solend
5.2/10Solana lending pioneer scarred by whale liquidation governance crisis — foundational but trust-damaged.
NAVI Protocol
5.0/10Sui's second-largest lending protocol — growing fast through incentives but organic demand and differentiation remain uncertain.
Spell Token (Abracadabra Money)
4.8/10Interest-bearing collateral lending and MIM stablecoin — innovative concept tarnished by the Wonderland scandal and persistent trust issues.
LayerBank
4.7/10Multi-chain lending protocol deployed across many L2s — the DeFi equivalent of a fast-food franchise, providing essential lending infrastructure everywhere but lacking depth anywhere.
Minterest
4.6/10Lending protocol with novel buyback mechanism to return protocol revenue to users. Interesting tokenomics thesis but limited adoption so far.
Sturdy Finance
4.6/10Innovative yield-bearing collateral lending with a checkered security history — creative economic model undermined by an exploit and limited adoption.
TrueFi
4.6/10Pioneer of uncollateralized DeFi lending -- real institutional loans issued but defaults and market downturn exposed credit risk limitations.
Dolomite
4.4/10Arbitrum's margin trading + lending hybrid — genuinely innovative architecture combining borrowing, lending, and leveraged trading in a unified protocol.
Inverse Finance
4.4/10Rebuilt from exploit ashes with innovative fixed-rate FiRM lending and DOLA stablecoin — creative design but small TVL and lingering bad debt.
Ionic Protocol
4.4/10Mode Network's primary lending market — early-stage Compound fork serving a nascent L2 ecosystem.
Unlockd
4.1/10NFT-backed lending with AI appraisals — tackles a real illiquidity problem in NFT markets, but thin markets, unreliable pricing, and NFT market downturns make sustainable NFT lending extremely difficult.
Aurelius
4.0/10Mantle Network lending protocol benefiting from the chain's treasury and mETH ecosystem but with limited track record.
Lendle
4.0/10Mantle Network's Aave v3 fork — leading lending protocol on the L2 with proven code but limited to Mantle's still-growing ecosystem.
Term Finance
4.0/10Auction-based fixed-rate lending modeled after Federal Reserve repo operations — institutional-grade mechanism design that fills DeFi's fixed-rate gap, but market demand is still developing.
Aries Markets
3.8/10Aptos-native lending protocol with margin trading — solid Move-based implementation but constrained by Aptos's still-developing DeFi ecosystem.
Impermax
3.8/10Leveraged LP yield farming protocol — clever niche product built for a Uniswap V2 world that has largely moved on.
Kinza Finance
3.8/10BNB Chain Aave V3 fork with solid execution — reliable lending protocol but limited differentiation beyond being a competent Aave clone on BNB.
Orbit Protocol
3.8/10Blast-native lending protocol leveraging L2 native yield. Meaningful TVL but heavily dependent on Blast ecosystem sustainability.
Radiant Capital
3.8/10A cross-chain lending protocol with an ambitious omnichain vision, critically compromised by a $50M+ multisig exploit that exposed fundamental security weaknesses.
Strike Finance
3.8/10Compound V2 fork on Ethereum with minimal differentiation — functional but irrelevant in a market dominated by Aave and Compound themselves.
Tectonic
3.8/10Compound fork dominating Cronos lending with limited competition, but constrained by Cronos ecosystem's small size and Crypto.com dependency.
Hifi Finance
3.6/10Fixed-rate lending protocol using tokenized debt instruments — clean design for predictable borrowing costs but near-zero TVL and negligible adoption.
Ironclad Finance
3.6/10Early-stage lending protocol on Mode Network L2. First-mover advantage on a small chain, but high dependency on Mode ecosystem growth.
Flux Protocol (ZeroOne)
3.5/10Multi-chain lending protocol filling gaps where Aave and Compound haven't deployed — functional Compound fork with modest adoption and limited differentiation.
Trava Finance
3.5/10BSC-based cross-chain lending protocol with credit scoring ambitions -- technically functional but negligible adoption and unclear differentiation.
INIT Capital
3.4/10Composable lending on Mantle with 'liquidity hooks' — innovative architecture that lets developers build custom borrowing strategies, but Mantle ecosystem adoption is early.
Exactly Protocol
3.3/10Fixed-rate lending on Optimism — genuinely innovative model offering what DeFi lending mostly lacks: predictable interest rates. One of the more interesting lending primitives.
marginfi
3.2/10Major Solana lending protocol that rode the points meta to massive TVL — technically solid but marred by founder drama, delayed token launch, and post-hype TVL decline.
Tashi
3.1/10Evmos lending protocol on a chain that never gained DeFi traction. Sound design limited by a struggling ecosystem.
Mimo Protocol
3.0/10Euro-pegged stablecoin lending (PAR) via crypto collateral — fills a real European DeFi gap but Euro stablecoin demand remains tiny compared to USD.
Tapioca
3.0/10Ambitious omnichain lending with novel tokenomics — but exploited for $4.7M through key compromise shortly after launch, raising major trust concerns.
ZeroLend
3.0/10Aave V3 fork leading the zkSync lending market — benefits from battle-tested code but differentiation beyond chain selection is minimal. First-mover on zkSync counts for something.
Wing Finance
2.9/10Ontology-based lending protocol — cross-chain ambitions undermined by negligible adoption, Ontology ecosystem decline, and minimal competitive differentiation.
BendDAO
2.8/10NFT lending protocol for blue-chips — survived the NFT winter and actually works. Activity tracks the NFT market, which has been in deep decline since 2022.
NFTfi
2.8/10The OG peer-to-peer NFT lending protocol — pioneered the space and still operates. P2P model enables flexible terms but matches slowly and scales poorly.
RAMP
2.8/10Cross-chain lending protocol for unlocking staked asset liquidity — had early traction but has faded to near-zero TVL.
Sonne Finance
2.8/10Optimism's Compound v2 fork — was the chain's top lending protocol until a $20M exploit via a known Compound vulnerability shattered trust.
Cooler Loans
2.7/10OlympusDAO's fixed-rate lending facility for gOHM holders — elegant mechanism design that efficiently utilizes the Olympus treasury, but extremely niche and tied entirely to OHM's fate.
Geist Finance
2.6/10Dead Aave fork on Fantom — rose with the chain's hype, died with its decline. Zero differentiation, zero future.
JPEG'd
2.4/10NFT-backed CDP lending — mint a stablecoin against your BAYC. Creative model combining MakerDAO-style CDPs with NFT collateral, but both NFTs and novel stablecoins are struggling.
Lever Finance
2.3/10DeFi leveraged trading protocol offering margin positions on crypto assets — functional concept but overshadowed by dedicated perp DEXs and more established lending platforms.
Juice Finance
2.2/10Blast L2 lending protocol that surfed the points wave for TVL — now facing the reality that most depositors were farming points, not seeking genuine lending services.
Radiant Capital
2.2/10Omnichain lending protocol devastated by $50M+ multisig compromise in October 2024 — two major exploits in one year make this one of DeFi's worst security failures.
Pine Protocol
2.1/10Multi-chain NFT lending protocol — broader collection support than BendDAO but thinner liquidity and weaker adoption. Another victim of the NFT market downturn.
PAC Finance
2.0/10Blast lending protocol that forced user liquidations by unilaterally changing collateral parameters without warning — a textbook case of governance failure in DeFi.
Cream Finance
1.8/10DeFi's most spectacularly exploited lending protocol — $150M+ lost across multiple attacks due to reckless collateral listing and shared-pool risk.
Hundred Finance
1.8/10Compound fork exploited for $7M via a known vulnerability — failed to implement a well-documented security fix, now effectively dead.
UwU Lend
1.8/10Sifu's lending protocol — Aave fork by the QuadrigaCX co-founder, exploited for $23M+ in two attacks within days. A masterclass in why founder reputation matters in DeFi.
Anchor Protocol
1.6/10Terra's 20% 'savings account' that subsidized unsustainable yields, triggered the UST/LUNA death spiral destroying $40B+, and became DeFi's most catastrophic failure.
Vesta Finance
1.5/10Defunct Liquity fork on Arbitrum that minted the VST stablecoin — shut down operations after failing to maintain peg stability and attract sustainable adoption. A cautionary tale for L2 Liquity forks.
Granary Finance
1.4/10Multi-chain Aave fork that got exploited for ~$5M via reentrancy in custom code — a case study in why forking battle-tested code doesn't guarantee safety when you modify it.