CoinClear

Pirl

2.6/10

Community-run Ethereum fork with masternodes — technically obsolete and nearly dead, kept alive by a handful of loyalists.

Updated: February 16, 2026AI Model: claude-4-opusVersion 1

Overview

Pirl launched in 2017 as a community-driven fork of Ethereum using the Ethash mining algorithm. The project added a masternode layer on top of the standard Ethereum architecture, with masternodes providing services like decentralized file storage (using IPFS integration), content distribution, and governance. Pirl positioned itself as a community-governed alternative to Ethereum with enhanced storage capabilities.

The project had no ICO — mining was the sole distribution method, which gave it some grassroots credibility. However, Pirl suffered multiple 51% attacks in 2018-2019 due to its small hashrate, leading to a transition to a hybrid PoW/masternode security model. As of 2026, Pirl is functionally dormant with negligible transaction activity, minimal development, and a tiny community of dedicated supporters keeping the chain operational.

Technology

Pirl is essentially Ethereum (pre-merge) with a masternode overlay. The chain supports Solidity smart contracts and is EVM-compatible. Masternodes run Pirl's PirlGuard protocol (developed after 51% attacks) which adds checkpoint-based protection against chain reorganizations. The storage layer uses IPFS-based content pinning through masternodes. While functional, the technology offers nothing that modern chains don't do better — EVM compatibility is ubiquitous, and decentralized storage solutions like Arweave and Filecoin far surpass Pirl's offering.

Security

Pirl suffered multiple 51% attacks in 2018 and 2019, losing significant funds from exchanges. The PirlGuard system was implemented as a countermeasure, penalizing miners who attempt to submit longer reorganization chains. This helped but doesn't fundamentally solve the low-hashrate problem. With Ethash mining largely dominated by Ethereum Classic after the Ethereum merge, Pirl's hashrate is trivially small. The masternode requirement provides some additional security but is insufficient against a determined attacker.

Decentralization

Pirl's community governance is its strongest philosophical feature. The project has no foundation, no corporate entity, and no pre-mine — decisions are made by the community through masternode voting. This is genuinely decentralized governance, though the community is so small that "decentralized" means a handful of dedicated volunteers. Masternode requirements (10,000 PIRL) are modest, keeping the barrier to governance participation low.

Ecosystem

Effectively nonexistent. Pirl's ecosystem consists of the base chain, a block explorer, a web wallet, and the masternode infrastructure. There is no DeFi, no NFTs, no active dApps, and no developer community building on Pirl. The decentralized storage feature, once the project's differentiator, is unused in any meaningful capacity. The chain processes a handful of transactions per day.

Tokenomics

PIRL has no max supply cap, with ongoing mining emissions. The token trades on minimal exchanges with negligible liquidity. Market cap is extremely small. Masternode rewards provide incentive for node operators, but with the token's low value, the economic incentive to run masternodes is minimal. The lack of an ICO means no concentrated insider holdings, which is positive, but it also means no funding for development.

Risk Factors

  • Functionally dead: Near-zero transaction activity and no active development
  • 51% attack history: Multiple successful attacks demonstrate fundamental security weakness
  • No ecosystem: Zero dApps, DeFi, or meaningful use cases
  • Obsolete technology: Ethash PoW fork offers nothing competitive in 2026
  • Negligible liquidity: Effectively impossible to trade significant amounts
  • No funding: Community-only funding means no resources for development or marketing

Conclusion

Pirl is a passion project kept alive by a small group of community loyalists. Its fair-launch ethos and community governance are philosophically admirable, and the response to 51% attacks (PirlGuard) showed technical resourcefulness. However, a community-governed Ethereum fork with masternodes has no viable niche in 2026's blockchain landscape. The technology is obsolete, the ecosystem is empty, and the chain is functionally dormant. Pirl is a historical footnote in the Ethereum-fork era — not a scam, just a project that time passed by.

Sources