CoinClear

Struct Finance

3.4/10

Yield tranching on Avalanche — well-designed structured products splitting DeFi yields into fixed and variable tranches, but the tranching niche has limited adoption.

Updated: February 16, 2026AI Model: claude-4-opusVersion 1

Overview

Struct Finance provides structured interest rate products on Avalanche by splitting yield-bearing DeFi positions into tranches with different risk profiles. Users deposit into vaults that generate yield from underlying protocols, and the vault's returns are divided: senior tranche holders receive a fixed rate (lower risk, lower return), while junior tranche holders receive the remaining variable yield (higher risk, potentially higher return). This mirrors traditional finance structured products, bringing institutional-grade risk stratification to DeFi.

Smart Contracts

The smart contract architecture is well-designed for the tranching use case. The vault system manages deposits, yield accrual, and tranche distribution with clear separation of concerns. The fixed-rate calculation and waterfall distribution mechanism (senior tranches paid first) are implemented correctly. The contracts handle edge cases like insufficient yield for senior tranche obligations by drawing from junior tranche deposits — a critical safety mechanism.

Security

Struct Finance's contracts have been audited, and the protocol has operated on Avalanche without security incidents. The tranching mechanism adds complexity compared to simple yield vaults, but the implementation handles this complexity competently. The primary security considerations are the underlying yield sources — if the protocols generating yield are exploited, Struct's tranched positions inherit that risk.

Yield Generation

The yield generation strategy is sound. By splitting existing DeFi yields into tranches, Struct creates risk-adjusted products from volatile DeFi returns. The fixed-rate tranche provides predictable returns (attractive for risk-averse capital), while the variable tranche amplifies returns for risk-tolerant participants. Integration with Avalanche DeFi protocols (TraderJoe, AAVE, GMX) provides diversified yield sources.

Adoption

Adoption is modest. TVL is limited, and the number of active vaults and participants is small. The tranching concept has struggled for adoption across DeFi — similar protocols (Saffron Finance, BarnBridge) have faced the same challenge. Most DeFi users prefer simple yield deposits over structured products, and institutional users who understand tranching haven't entered DeFi at scale.

Tokenomics

Token economics include governance and incentives for vault participation. The tokenomics are functional but secondary to the protocol's utility proposition. With limited TVL, token demand is primarily speculative. The design would function well at scale but current activity levels don't generate meaningful protocol revenue.

Risk Factors

  • Niche adoption: DeFi tranching has struggled for user adoption across all platforms
  • Limited TVL: Small vault sizes limit the protocol's impact
  • Underlying protocol risk: Yield sources can be exploited, affecting all tranche holders
  • Complexity barrier: Tranching is a complex concept for retail DeFi users
  • Avalanche ecosystem dependency: Tied to Avalanche DeFi ecosystem growth

Conclusion

Struct Finance brings a well-executed version of yield tranching to Avalanche. The 3.4 score reflects solid smart contract design, genuine financial innovation, and effective risk stratification mechanics, tempered by the persistent adoption challenge facing DeFi structured products. The protocol proves that sophisticated TradFi concepts can be implemented on-chain; the market for them in DeFi just hasn't arrived yet.

Sources