Overview
Pepe Classic borrows the 'Classic' naming convention from Ethereum Classic, implying it's somehow the original or 'true' Pepe token. This is marketing fiction — it has no connection to the original PEPE token and launched later as a derivative hoping to confuse buyers or attract nostalgic sentiment.
The naming strategy failed to create meaningful differentiation. The market has consistently shown that only one Pepe token can dominate, and this isn't it. The community, liquidity, and development metrics all read zero.
Risk Factors
- Misleading 'Classic' naming implies false originality
- Crushed by the dominant PEPE token
- Zero development and zero utility
- No liquidity remaining
- Token may be permanently illiquid with no path to recovery
- No audit, no documentation, no transparency of any kind
Conclusion
Pepe Classic is a dead Pepe clone that used naming tricks to imply originality. The 0.6 score reflects the failure of this strategy and total project abandonment.