CoinClear

Groyper

2.0/10

Political frog memecoin from right-wing internet culture — extremely niche, controversial, and pure speculation with reputational risks.

Updated: February 16, 2026AI Model: claude-4-opusVersion 1

Overview

Groyper is a memecoin themed around the "Groyper" toad meme, a variant of the Pepe the Frog character associated with right-wing internet culture and the political movement led by Nick Fuentes. The token emerged during the 2024-2025 political memecoin wave, attempting to monetize a specific internet subculture's memes and political allegiances. Multiple versions of Groyper tokens have appeared across Ethereum and Solana, with varying degrees of legitimacy.

The Groyper meme itself is a toad character often used in right-wing political discourse online. By tokenizing this meme, the project attempts to capture financial value from cultural and political sentiment — a trend that accelerated after the success of PEPE and political tokens like the Trump memecoin. The token has no utility, technology, or development activity.

Community

The Groyper community is drawn from the intersection of memecoin traders and right-wing internet culture. This creates a highly niche and polarizing community. Social media activity centers on X/Twitter and Telegram, with engagement spiking around political events and broader memecoin rallies. The community is small compared to mainstream memecoins like PEPE or DOGE, limited by the controversial nature of the Groyper brand.

Liquidity

Liquidity is thin across DEX deployments. Trading occurs primarily on Uniswap (Ethereum) and Raydium (Solana) with modest pool depth. Volume is erratic, spiking during political events and crypto-wide memecoin pumps. The token is not listed on any centralized exchanges of note. Attempting to trade significant amounts will result in substantial slippage. Multiple copycat tokens with similar names add confusion.

On-Chain Metrics

On-chain data shows a small holder base with significant concentration among top wallets. Transaction volume is low and sporadic. The token exhibits classic micro-cap memecoin patterns: early accumulation by insiders, periodic pump-and-dump patterns, and declining holder engagement over time. No utility-driven transactions exist — all activity is speculative trading.

Development

There is no development. The token is a standard ERC-20/SPL token with no additional functionality. No smart contracts, no dApps, no roadmap, no team building anything. The associated web presence is minimal. Any claims of future features are marketing without substance.

Risk Assessment

Groyper carries all standard memecoin risks plus unique reputational and regulatory risks. The association with controversial political figures and movements means holding or promoting the token carries social and professional reputational risk. Platforms may delist or restrict the token. The controversial branding limits exchange listings and institutional involvement. Multiple competing tokens with similar names create additional confusion risk.

Risk Factors

  • Controversial branding: Association with polarizing political movement limits adoption
  • Zero utility: No technology, product, or development
  • Thin liquidity: Negligible depth, high slippage on any meaningful trade
  • Multiple copycats: Competing tokens with similar names cause confusion
  • Reputational risk: Holding the token carries social and professional risks
  • Regulatory exposure: Political tokens may attract scrutiny
  • Anonymous team: No accountability for creators

Conclusion

Groyper is a memecoin that monetizes a specific political subculture's memes. Unlike broader memecoins like PEPE that appeal across political lines, Groyper's association with a specific and controversial political movement severely limits its addressable market. The token has no utility, no development, thin liquidity, and significant reputational risk. For memecoin traders who understand and accept these risks, it's a pure sentiment bet on a niche internet subculture. For everyone else, the combination of financial risk and reputational exposure makes it best avoided.

Sources