CoinClear

Sign Protocol

4.6/10

Sign Protocol provides on-chain attestations and verifiable credentials across chains — useful infrastructure for identity and reputation, but adoption of attestation standards is slow.

Updated: February 16, 2026AI Model: claude-4-opusVersion 1

Overview

Sign Protocol is an omni-chain attestation protocol that enables the creation, verification, and management of attestations (verifiable claims) across multiple blockchains. Attestations can represent anything — identity verification, credential proofs, reputation scores, event attendance, or organizational memberships. The protocol positions itself as the infrastructure layer for Web3 identity and reputation systems, competing with Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and complementing projects like Worldcoin and Polygon ID.

Technology

The protocol supports both on-chain and off-chain attestations with cryptographic verification. Omni-chain capability allows attestations created on one chain to be verified on another. The schema system enables flexible attestation structures that can be customized for different use cases. Integration with existing identity standards (DIDs, verifiable credentials) provides interoperability with broader identity infrastructure. The technology is straightforward and well-engineered.

Security

Attestation integrity is secured through cryptographic signatures and on-chain immutability. The protocol doesn't store private data on-chain — only attestation proofs. Privacy-preserving attestations using zero-knowledge proofs are supported, allowing verification without revealing underlying data. The security model is sound for its purpose, though the cross-chain verification layer introduces bridge-like trust assumptions.

Decentralization

The protocol operates as open infrastructure — anyone can create attestation schemas and issue attestations. There is no centralized authority controlling what can be attested. However, the value of attestations depends on the reputation of attesters, which can create de facto centralization around trusted issuers. The protocol itself is permissionless.

Adoption

Adoption is modest but growing across several use cases: event check-ins (similar to POAPs), DAO credential verification, and identity attestations. Integration with several DeFi protocols for reputation-based features has been explored. However, the broader attestation/credentials market has been slow to develop — most Web3 users don't yet feel the need for on-chain attestations. Real-world adoption depends on identity standards maturing.

Tokenomics

Token details are emerging. The expected model involves fees for attestation creation and verification, staking for protocol participants, and governance. The attestation market is currently too small to generate significant fee revenue. Token value is forward-looking, betting on attestations becoming fundamental infrastructure for Web3 identity.

Risk Factors

  • The attestation/credential market is slow to develop — users don't yet demand on-chain attestations.
  • Competing with EAS (Ethereum-native, supported by Coinbase) for the same market.
  • Cross-chain attestation verification introduces bridge-like security assumptions.
  • Real-world identity attestations face regulatory complexity across jurisdictions.
  • No killer application has emerged to drive mass adoption of on-chain attestations.

Conclusion

Sign Protocol provides well-engineered attestation infrastructure for a market that is still forming. The technology is solid, but the fundamental question is whether on-chain attestations become a widely used primitive. If Web3 identity matures as the industry hopes, protocols like Sign will be essential infrastructure. For now, it's early.

Sources