CoinClear

Saber

3.6/10

Once-dominant Solana stablecoin DEX that has largely been eclipsed by Jupiter, Orca, and native Solana DeFi growth.

Updated: February 16, 2026AI Model: claude-4-opusVersion 1

Overview

Saber launched in mid-2021 as Solana's answer to Curve Finance — a stableswap AMM optimized for low-slippage swaps between similarly-priced assets. At its peak in late 2021, Saber held over $4 billion in TVL, making it the largest protocol on Solana. It supported dozens of stablecoin and wrapped-asset pools (USDC/USDT, renBTC/wBTC, mSOL/SOL, etc.) and was a critical routing layer for Solana DeFi.

The protocol was created by the Saber Labs team (later revealed to be connected to the prolific pseudonymous Macalinao brothers, who created multiple interlinked Solana protocols that inflated each other's TVL metrics). This revelation damaged trust in the project. As Solana DeFi evolved, aggregators like Jupiter made Saber's standalone interface less relevant, and concentrated liquidity DEXs like Orca's Whirlpools offered superior capital efficiency.

Today, Saber operates with a fraction of its former TVL and volume, largely maintained by existing pools rather than active development.

Smart Contracts

Saber's smart contracts are built on Solana's Rust-based programming model using the Anchor framework. The core StableSwap program implements Curve's invariant adapted for Solana's account model. The code was open-sourced and relatively straightforward for a stableswap implementation. However, active development has effectively ceased, and the contracts have not been updated to incorporate improvements seen in newer Solana DeFi protocols. The lack of ongoing maintenance is a concern — smart contract infrastructure that is not actively maintained on a rapidly evolving chain like Solana will accumulate technical debt.

Security

Saber's contracts were audited by Bramah Systems during the initial launch period. No major exploits have occurred on the core stableswap contracts. However, the broader ecosystem of related protocols created by the same team (including Cashio, which suffered a $52M exploit in 2022) raised questions about code quality and oversight. The bug bounty program is effectively inactive. The protocol's declining activity means it receives less adversarial attention, which is a double-edged sword — fewer attackers targeting it, but also fewer white-hats reviewing it.

Liquidity

Saber's liquidity has collapsed from its peak of $4B+ TVL to under $30M. Remaining pools are concentrated in a handful of stablecoin pairs. Slippage for meaningful trade sizes can be significant in less popular pools. Most Solana stablecoin routing now flows through Jupiter's aggregation layer, which may route through Saber pools but only when they offer competitive pricing. LP yields are minimal given low volume, creating a negative feedback loop of liquidity withdrawal.

Adoption

At peak, Saber was the backbone of Solana DeFi stablecoin swaps. Today, it handles negligible volume compared to Jupiter, Raydium, and Orca. The protocol's user base has largely migrated. Saber is not actively integrated into new Solana protocols, and its relevance is primarily historical. The project's association with the Macalinao controversy further suppressed organic adoption recovery.

Tokenomics

SBR has a total supply of 10 billion tokens. The token was distributed through liquidity mining, which attracted mercenary capital during the 2021 Solana summer. SBR governance controls protocol parameters, but with minimal protocol revenue and no meaningful fee distribution, the token has little intrinsic value. SBR has lost over 99% of its peak value. The veSBR model (vote-escrowed staking) was introduced to create locking incentives, but with negligible protocol revenue to distribute, it provides no compelling reason to lock tokens.

Risk Factors

  • Abandoned Development: Active development has effectively stopped. No meaningful protocol upgrades or improvements are expected.
  • Macalinao Controversy: The revelation that the founding team created multiple interconnected protocols to inflate metrics severely damaged credibility and trust.
  • Liquidity Death Spiral: Declining TVL leads to worse execution, which leads to less volume, which leads to lower yields, which leads to more liquidity withdrawal.
  • Solana Ecosystem Competition: Jupiter, Orca, and Raydium have captured the stablecoin swap market on Solana with superior products.
  • Token Worthlessness: SBR has no meaningful value accrual mechanism and has lost nearly all value.
  • Smart Contract Stagnation: Unmaintained contracts on a rapidly evolving chain accumulate risk over time.

Conclusion

Saber is a cautionary tale of early-mover advantage squandered by controversy and competitive pressure. It was genuinely important infrastructure for Solana DeFi in 2021, but the Macalinao team's deceptive TVL inflation practices, combined with the natural evolution of Solana's DEX landscape toward aggregation and concentrated liquidity, rendered Saber largely irrelevant. The protocol still functions and processes some volume through Jupiter routing, but it is not actively developed, its token is essentially worthless, and there is no credible path to recovery. Investors should treat SBR as a dead asset.

Sources