CoinClear

Camelot DEX

6.2/10

Arbitrum-native DEX with custom LP types and NFT positions — the go-to launchpad and liquidity venue for new Arbitrum projects.

Updated: February 16, 2026AI Model: claude-4-opusVersion 1

Overview

Camelot launched in late 2022 as an Arbitrum-native DEX designed specifically to serve the Arbitrum ecosystem's liquidity needs. Rather than simply forking Uniswap, Camelot built a custom AMM with multiple pool types (volatile and stable), directional swap fees, and spNFT (staked position NFT) LP representations. The protocol positions itself as an "ecosystem-focused" DEX that helps new Arbitrum projects bootstrap liquidity through custom launchpad features and flexible pool configurations.

Camelot gained significant traction during Arbitrum's explosive growth in early 2023, particularly around the ARB airdrop. The protocol became the preferred launch venue for dozens of Arbitrum-native projects, offering custom pool configurations and incentive structures that generic DEXs couldn't match. The Nitro pools (custom incentive layers on top of base LP positions) became a powerful tool for projects to attract and retain liquidity.

The protocol has maintained strong ecosystem integration and community engagement through 2024-2025, though it faces increasing competition from Uniswap V3/V4 deployments on Arbitrum and cross-chain aggregation that commoditizes execution. Camelot's differentiation lies in its ecosystem-first approach and flexibility rather than raw volume metrics.

Smart Contracts

Custom AMM Architecture

Camelot's AMM supports two pool types: volatile pools (constant-product formula with customizations) and stable pools (Curve-like stable swap). The dual-pool architecture allows efficient trading for both correlated and uncorrelated asset pairs. Directional fees allow different swap fees depending on trade direction — enabling protocols to fine-tune their liquidity pool economics.

spNFT Positions

Staked Position NFTs (spNFTs) represent LP positions with additional yield layers. spNFTs wrap base LP tokens and can be staked in Nitro pools for additional rewards. This composable position system is more complex than standard LP tokens but enables richer incentive structures for ecosystem projects.

Nitro Pools

Nitro pools are custom incentive layers that protocols can deploy on top of Camelot LP positions. They allow projects to add their own token rewards with custom conditions (minimum lock periods, minimum position sizes, etc.). This programmable incentive system is Camelot's key differentiator.

Security

Audit History

Camelot's contracts have been audited by Paladin (now Cyfrin) and other security firms. The custom AMM, spNFT system, and Nitro pools have all undergone security reviews. The protocol has also engaged in bug bounty programs to incentivize vulnerability discovery.

No Major Exploits

Camelot has not suffered a major smart contract exploit since launch. The protocol's custom codebase (not a direct fork) represents both a risk (less battle-tested) and an opportunity (purpose-built architecture). Two years of operation without major incident provides reasonable confidence.

Complexity Risk

The spNFT and Nitro pool systems introduce complexity beyond a standard AMM. More complex systems have more attack surface. The layered position structure (LP token → spNFT → Nitro pool) creates multiple points of potential vulnerability.

Liquidity

Arbitrum Ecosystem Hub

Camelot maintains meaningful TVL on Arbitrum, typically ranking among the top 5 DEXs on the chain. Liquidity is concentrated in major Arbitrum pairs (ETH/USDC, ARB/ETH) and in pools for Arbitrum-native tokens that launched on Camelot's platform.

Launchpad Effect

New projects launching on Camelot bring initial liquidity that often remains in the ecosystem. The launchpad function creates a natural pipeline of new liquidity pools and trading volume. This ecosystem-building approach is more sustainable than purely incentive-driven liquidity.

Competition for Depth

For major trading pairs, Camelot competes with Uniswap V3 and Sushiswap on Arbitrum. Aggregators route to the best execution, meaning Camelot must maintain competitive spreads. For long-tail Arbitrum-native tokens, Camelot often has exclusive or dominant liquidity.

Adoption

Project Launchpad

Camelot's strongest adoption metric is its role as the preferred launch venue for Arbitrum-native projects. Dozens of projects have used Camelot's custom pools and Nitro incentives to bootstrap liquidity. This creates network effects — projects that launch on Camelot direct their communities to trade there.

Ecosystem Integration

Deep integration with the Arbitrum ecosystem including partnerships with major Arbitrum protocols, participation in Arbitrum governance, and support from the Arbitrum Foundation through STIP and LTIPP incentive programs. Camelot has been a significant recipient of ARB incentive grants.

Community Engagement

The "Round Table" governance model and active community engagement have built a loyal user base. Camelot's branding and community management are above average for DeFi protocols, contributing to strong mindshare within the Arbitrum ecosystem.

Tokenomics

GRAIL and xGRAIL

Camelot uses a dual-token model: GRAIL (liquid governance token) and xGRAIL (non-transferable staked token). GRAIL can be converted to xGRAIL for enhanced yields and governance power, while converting xGRAIL back to GRAIL requires a vesting period (with penalties for early exit). This design encourages long-term commitment.

Fee Distribution

Protocol fees are distributed to xGRAIL holders, providing real yield from swap volume. The fee-sharing mechanism creates genuine token value accrual tied to protocol usage.

Supply Concerns

GRAIL emissions for liquidity mining create ongoing sell pressure. The relatively high FDV relative to current market cap suggests significant future dilution. The xGRAIL lock mechanism mitigates some sell pressure but doesn't eliminate it.

Risk Factors

  • Arbitrum ecosystem dependency: Camelot's success is tied to Arbitrum's continued growth and relevance.
  • Competition from Uniswap V3/V4: Uniswap's Arbitrum deployment competes directly for major pair liquidity.
  • Custom codebase risk: Purpose-built contracts have less battle-testing than Uniswap forks.
  • Incentive dependency: Reliance on ARB grants and GRAIL emissions for liquidity attraction.
  • spNFT complexity: Layered position system introduces potential user confusion and smart contract risk.
  • Token dilution: Ongoing GRAIL emissions create sell pressure despite xGRAIL locking mechanism.
  • Launchpad quality: Protocol reputation is tied to the quality and success of launched projects.

Conclusion

Camelot has successfully carved out a differentiated position on Arbitrum through its ecosystem-first approach, custom pool infrastructure, and project launchpad functionality. The spNFT and Nitro pool systems provide genuine innovation in how liquidity incentives are structured, and the protocol's role as Arbitrum's native launchpad creates sustainable adoption through ecosystem building rather than pure mercenary incentives.

The 6.2 score reflects solid execution across all dimensions without standout weakness. Camelot's risk lies in its Arbitrum dependency and competition from Uniswap deployments. The protocol's strongest asset is its ecosystem integration and the network effects from its launchpad role. If Arbitrum continues to grow, Camelot is well-positioned. If L2 competition intensifies and Arbitrum's position weakens, Camelot's single-chain focus becomes a liability.

Sources