CoinClear

Union

5.4/10

Union brings ZK-verified IBC to connect Cosmos and Ethereum trustlessly — technically impressive and addresses a real gap, but adoption is early and the bridge market is fiercely competitive.

Updated: February 16, 2026AI Model: claude-4-opusVersion 1

Overview

Union is a zero-knowledge bridge protocol that brings trustless interoperability between Cosmos (via IBC) and Ethereum (via ZK light client verification). Traditional bridges rely on multisigs, optimistic verification, or trusted validators — all of which introduce trust assumptions. Union replaces these with ZK proofs that cryptographically verify cross-chain state transitions. This is the holy grail of bridge design — trustless verification with the security guarantees of the underlying chains. The project uses a custom consensus-verification ZK circuit and is positioning itself as the trust layer for cross-chain communication.

Security

Security is Union's primary value proposition. ZK-verified bridges provide the strongest possible security guarantees — cross-chain messages are verified by mathematical proof rather than economic or social trust. This eliminates the multisig compromise vector that has caused billions in bridge exploits (Ronin, Wormhole, Nomad). The ZK light client verifies the source chain's consensus without trusting intermediaries. However, the ZK circuits themselves are novel and require extensive verification to ensure soundness.

Technology

The technology combines IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) protocol standards with zero-knowledge proof generation for cross-chain consensus verification. Union generates ZK proofs that attest to the finality of source chain state, which the destination chain can verify on-chain. This works for Cosmos chains natively (via IBC) and for Ethereum through a ZK-verified light client. The proof generation system uses custom circuits optimized for consensus verification, which is technically ambitious.

Decentralization

Union's ZK-based approach is inherently more decentralized than multisig bridges — there is no trusted committee that can be compromised or bribed. The proof generation can be performed by anyone. However, the current prover network is small and centralized, and the proving infrastructure requires significant computational resources. Decentralizing the prover set is a work in progress.

Adoption

Adoption is early — Union has launched with connections between Cosmos chains and Ethereum, but transaction volume and TVL are modest compared to established bridges (LayerZero, Wormhole). The DeFi-critical use case of trustless Cosmos-Ethereum bridging is compelling but faces the cold-start problem — users need liquidity and applications on both sides.

Tokenomics

The UNO token provides staking for validators, governance, and fee payments for cross-chain transfers. The token model benefits from growing bridge volume, as each cross-chain message generates fees. However, current volume is too low to generate meaningful fee revenue. Token value is forward-looking, betting on ZK bridges becoming the standard.

Risk Factors

  • ZK circuits for consensus verification are novel and may contain undiscovered bugs.
  • Early adoption with low volume — the bridge needs critical mass to be useful.
  • Competing with deeply established bridges (LayerZero, Wormhole) that have massive existing integrations.
  • ZK proof generation is computationally expensive, creating latency and cost overhead.
  • The Cosmos-Ethereum bridging market may be smaller than anticipated.

Conclusion

Union represents the technically correct approach to cross-chain bridging — trustless, ZK-verified, and mathematically secured. In a world where bridge exploits have cost billions, this approach is invaluable. The challenge is bootstrapping adoption against entrenched competitors that sacrifice security for convenience. If the market values bridge security, Union should thrive. If convenience continues to win, growth will be slower.

Sources